Plot
In regards to the plot of Minority Report, the similarities are virtually nonexistent. While in both the film and short story, Mr. Anderton seeks to find his "minority report", their results differ greatly. In the short story, Ed Anderton finds his minority report and then tries and fails to live out the reality illustrated in said report. The movie takes a completely different route; John Anderton seeks guidance from Agatha, one of the precogs, only to find that he has no minority report and he is destined to kill Leo Crow, a man he has never met. He then continues to steal Agatha and find Crow to find out why he is destined to kill him. Once there, Agatha explains how he has a choice of whether or not to commit the murder and he does not follow through with it, the complete opposite of what occurs in the short story. Throughout the story story, Anderton's soul purpose is to keep Precrime in existence; he is even driven to murder and banishment so the potentially flawed system can stay in use. In the film, Anderton realizes how Precrime can possibly arrest potentially innocent people for crimes they may not have actually committed because everyone has a choice of whether to follow through with what they intend to do or not. At the end of the story, the Precogs go and live normal lives in seclusion and the Precrime system is abolished.
Point of View
The point of view exercised in the film version of this story was similar to that of the book, but considering that a movie does not describe the actions and interactions of characters and rather just shows them, a comparison is difficult to be made. As in the short story, most of the movie is spent following Anderton and his interactions with others. The audience knows everything about him and his thoughts are described through his interactions with his environment when he is alone. A slight deviation from the story of John Anderton is made when a subplot about a man, Lamar Burgess, who has figured out how to get away with murder without getting caught is snuck into the story. The reason for this subplot was to explain another flaw in the Precrime system. The flaw deals with echoes, an alleged reoccurrence of a vision of a murder. Burgess learned that if he created a murder to look like a murder of the past, the technicians of the Precrime agency would merely pass it off as an echo.
Characterization
Just as in the short story, indirect characterization was used to describe the characters. Anderton is described through is actions, reactions, and interactions with others and himself. Although he can be pretty well characterized through his interactions with others, the audience truly gets to know him through his inner struggle with himself and all of the other problems that he is dealing with in his life. Furthermore, it is through indirect characterization that the audience has to figure out for themselves who the good guys and bad guys really are. I believe this to be the case in most films. If there were to be a narrator that tells the audience how and what each character feels at every moment, the thrill, question, and excitement would be taken away and you would simply be left with some sort of weird sci-fi documentary.
Setting
Both the short story and the book were set in the future. In the short story, a time or year is not given, only the fact that the story takes places some time in the future. The movie; however, specifies that the events taking place are in the relatively near future, in the year 2054. A minor difference in setting is where the actual Precrime initiative is located. In the short story, Precrime is located in New York, while in the movie it is located in Washington D.C. This minute change in setting has no impact on the story because the setting plays no role. In the future, the cities are unrecognizable and have changed immensely from what they are today.
Theme
The theme for the movie is similar to the book in the fact that it is about fate and deception. Although these two themes are expressed in very different ways than in the short story, they are still present. Anderton is continually on the fight to to stop his fate, as predicted by the Precogs, from happening. He seeks out his minority report and finds that it does not exist, but that does no stop him. He seeks out the man he is supposed, Leo Crow, to kill to try to better understand why he will kill him and to try to fight his fate. In the end, he does not kill Crow, Crow kills himself, because Agatha tell Anderton that he can chose his fate. Deception is also evident through the lies of Lamar Burgess. He used the Precog system to cover up his own murders and trick others into thinking that Anderton was the culprit.







